Which aspect of organizational charts is typically shown only where feasible in relation to the City’s budget?

In the context of organizational charts, staffing of established positions is typically shown only where feasible in relation to the City’s budget because it directly correlates with the available financial resources and appropriations. An organizational chart provides a visual representation of the hierarchy and structure within an organization, outlining the different roles and their interrelations.

When considering staffing, many positions may be budgeted but may not be filled due to financial constraints. This means that while the organizational chart may indicate a position exists within a certain department, it doesn't always reflect active staffing for that role if the budget does not allow for it. As a result, staffing can be a more variable element that is contingent upon the organization's financial health, making it a critical aspect that’s only depicted when possible.

Other elements such as functional responsibilities, position authority and description, and the relationship of organizational units are more stable aspects that do not fluctuate with budgeting constraints as directly as staffing does. They typically provide clear insights into what roles are necessary and how they relate to one another, irrespective of budgetary considerations.