What is the nature of an arbitrator's decision concerning unresolved grievances, according to the Administrative Code?

In the context of unresolved grievances, the nature of an arbitrator's decision is typically advisory for independent departments. This means that while the arbitrator can provide guidance and recommendations on how to resolve the grievance, the independent departments are not legally bound to implement these recommendations. This advisory capacity allows for flexibility and encourages departments to consider the arbitrator's insights while ultimately retaining the authority to make their own determinations regarding the grievance.

This aspect is particularly significant in maintaining the autonomy of independent departments to manage their affairs according to their policies or operational needs. Thus, the advisory role of the arbitrator fosters communication and potential solutions without imposing a mandatory decision, which can promote cooperation and resolution without circumventing departmental authority.

In contrast, options suggesting that the decision is binding or final with no room for appeal would imply a level of authority that overrides the departments' discretion, which is not applicable in this context. The advisory nature reflects a balance between resolving grievances and respecting departmental independence.