What is considered the soundest solution for increasing job opportunities for disadvantaged individuals in a merit-based governmental setting?

The analysis and redesign of jobs is considered the soundest solution for increasing job opportunities for disadvantaged individuals in a merit-based governmental setting because it focuses on modifying the roles and responsibilities associated with positions to make them more accessible and achievable for a broader range of candidates. This approach allows organizations to rethink how jobs are structured, making them more inclusive by removing unnecessary barriers that may disadvantage certain groups.

By analyzing job functions, organizations can identify essential skills and competencies that truly contribute to job performance and distinguish them from those that are less critical. This means that the focus can shift from rigid qualifications to evaluating a candidate's potential and diverse experiences. Redesigning jobs can include creating entry-level positions or training programs that support the development of necessary skills for disadvantaged individuals, thereby fostering a more equitable hiring process.

In contrast, other options may not holistically address the root issues of access and opportunity. For instance, exempting individuals from Civil Service requirements could undermine the integrity of the merit-based system, while establishing performance requirements related solely to exams may still leave certain individuals at a disadvantage if they lack access to resources needed to perform well on such tests. Employee referral programs, on the other hand, can perpetuate networks that may marginalize disadvantaged individuals, as they often rely on